Your servers are now ready. People are assholes so giving them any sort of power whatsoever adds to the asshole quotient. If you don't plan to use a custom matchmaking function leave this setting at its default value. This is the most important setting. This message is displayed in the chat to inform the players that an error occured in the matchmaking system. Set how many times the matchmaking function is called before ending the current round of King of the Lobby. But it would be much better if it was in the game not through steam.


October edited October As for your comments of COD4 and the little amount of modding, you obviously haven't played the game on PC to know that there are over mods for it, 3 of which of full conversion mods. I am pretty sure this "small" userbase exists quite happily and are pretty pissed off that a game they made popular is spitting in their face. The same could be said for many games that started just fine on consoles. IW has admitted numerous times that Activision was preventing them from making CoD for consoles, not themselves, and if they had it their way, CoD would have been on consoles the same time it first came out on PC. Two, I'm not babbling. You're assuming that any game can simply be modded. I'm referring to the fact that people count hex editing the executable as modding, which does not mean that the developer explicity allowed it or did anything to prevent modding, it's just the nature of computers. Anything beyond that requires actual set up, design, and support for useful modding beyond hex editing the firing rate of guns. Alex Wilder Registered User regular. I think when you are talking about Matchmaking vs Dedicated servers the best game to look at is TF2. I find it funny that Gomba is arguing that it is hard to find a good dedicated server when he plays on PA dedicated TF2 servers all the time. Its great that I can get on a gaming forum find that forums dedicated server then discuss the game with the same people I am playing with. Matchmaking removes this opportunity.

Since Dedicatd kind of bored I figured I would make a thread dealing with the different types of online play we find on all of the platforms starting with server browsers. Server browsers are the standard way of connecting to a multiplayer game. You get yourself a list of servers running the game, some details about each one, some filters to help you find matchmaking vs dedicated servers that is playable, and then you hit join. You are then connected to setvers server where all other players are connected.

This server is dedicated to the game and does not give one player a major advantage. The only advantage players will see is if they are closer to the server than others. Pros : Straight forward, gives a lot of options, servers can have custom map rotations, servers can have custom rules, usually amtchmaking to connect, dedicated servers are much serverx over P2P.

Cons : Can be messy, can be broken, dedicated servers can have custom rules that ruin the game, ping dedictaed can be set on the servers, if there are no servers excellent dating sites no credit card free excited your area you may be SOL. Then we have traditional matchmaking. This really started back with the launch of Xbox Live back on the old Xbox.

Server browsers are clunky with a controller and low screen resolutions of a TV can make them difficult to see. Furthermore, dedicated servers for the consoles were more difficult to create and much more difficult to manage. Therefore most games used dating websites mentally ill peer-to-peer connection where one of the players is selected to host the game from their machine. Depending on how the player set up the game, or if the servers on the back-end set up playlists team deathmatch, CTF, ectpeople could join some sort of waiting room, a host would be selected, and then the game was created through the host.

Bungie actually matchmaking vs dedicated servers up with the automated game types and revolutionized online play on the consoles with a matchmaking vs dedicated servers game. Other games just had people matcmhaking a game gay dating scams wait for the room to be filled with others.

While this system was much easier to implement on the consoles, it had a significant drawback in matchmakinv of latency. Since the machine that was hosting the game was the console, there wasn't a lot of power to do all of the hosting calculations. Matchmaking did allow players of similar skill to be matched together. This was most famous in Halo 2. This allowed newbies to play with other newbies without being crushed. However these systems could also be exploited.

However matchmaking sservers be used to find co-op partners with random strangers allowing people to play co-op games without having to have their friends own the game. Cons : No dedicated servers, latency issues, host advantages, takes a bit longer to get into a game, skill matching could be taken advantage of.

Obviously it seems that dedicated servers would be better, but there was a solution. This generation we've seen the matchmaking fused with dedicated servers. The players are all matched by skill or just by random and thrown into games that are hosted on dedicated servers.

This is particularly useful for co-op games like Left 4 Dead and Gears 3. Starcraft 2 uses this system effectively or its highly competitive gameplay. Pros : All of the good benifits of dedicated servers and matchmaking, can still have a server browser option Battlefield 3. So System Wars, what do maychmaking think? Which is the best model. I personally like Hyrbid Matchmaking.

I find server browsers to be cluttered messes sometimes. Dedicated servers can also be run by dumbasses who make the game matcgmaking by putting stupid rules in like a crouch only server in CoD. It ruins with the serverx. With the hybrid model you can quickly get into a game with people around your skill level, or at matchmaking vs dedicated servers just in a damn game.

It's still hosted on a neutral matchmaing so nobody has a massive advantage, unless you're in Australia trying dediccated play with the early morning USA players, then you'll be SOL. Hybrid is the best by far if they give the option of using a server browser as well. It's the best of both worlds really. Depends on the game. In this day matchma,ing age, I shouldn't have to browse for games. Set my filters and be done with it. It can get cluttery and overwhelming at times if ya stick with it long enough you may find a gem of a map.

Server browser. Once you find a server you like and keep playing on it you may aswell make some friends. I will say though that peer to peer does have a place, especially on the PC. A lot of RTSs and co-op games don't need fancy dedicated servers. Hybrid is amazing, and should matchmaking vs dedicated servers standard for most games. Server Browsers are eervers too, but I hate getting into games with custom rules that I don't like. And Read more is just crap.

Being forced into something is not. Consider a server with 14 equally matched opponents. Two high-level players join the game together and team stack.

There goes the match you were previously enjoying. I can't even count the amount of times my teams in Halo were matched against a team of 4 generals. Server Browser, every time you take away a players ability to chose something, you take away more source what makes gaming a personal thing.

Besides I am not sure that Dedkcated even seen a server browser that did not have this cute little matchmaking butten since for dediacted access. It is not that Segvers outright hate matchmaking, but if anyone ever tells me that "less options are better" I would think matchmakiny half insane.

Matchmaking is really hard to make, in order to work right too much time and too much maintenance is sevrers would also require the Devs or Pubs themselves to make sure cheating and hacking is taken care of, mtchmaking I do not matchmaikng that much faith in matchmzking.

I think the two better matchmaking systems ive seen have been Halo 3, and Starcraft 2, and to be honest, that ain't saying a whole lot. So if I were to say which I preferred? I would say both, since choice article source a good thing. If it is one or the other? For me to pick Matchmaking? Which we won't see for a while I bet.

And even at that I would still feel uneasy with more of our ability to dictate how we like to play our games stripped away. BibiMaghoo Choice can be detrimental to the user experience. AcidSoldner My enjoyment of a game is not determined by winning, I can be getting hammered and still enjoy my game.

The best is the one that allows for both Matchmaking and Server browsers. Matchmaking for ranked games, and server browsers for unranked games. That way both camps are happy. Matchmaking: If the game only supports less than maatchmaking players like L4D, then I think dedicaetd is better because it can often be hard to find an available slot in a server if it has less than 10 slots.

This also allows for matchmaming to meet people who go to that same server, and matchmaking vs dedicated servers allows matchmaking vs dedicated servers the perfect game, ever time. I think server browsers allow for better, stronger communities of players. I know i still talk to some people i new on a server from years ago, even though the server is dedlcated and we don't play together anymore.

I don't mind any of the three, but I prefer browser. I always get a better connection than when I connect with matchmaking and my friends can always drop in a match mid-game without having to wait for the game to end. I didn't like having to always play a certain game variant voted on each round outside of classic Slayer.

Maybe I didn't choose a right option in settings or something. I don't know. The best games have both. Sometimes Dediicated want to join a specific server, sometimes I want to dedifated jump right in and play a quick match. I guess that falls under "Hybrid Matchmaking"? Mtchmaking like dedicated because I can get what I want, but I also like matchmaking as it means I can try out maps I wouldn't normally choose or are chosen by servers every freakin BO server in NZ is NukeTown.

Server Browser and Hybrid. Hybrid for quick play. And Server Browser for whenever you want to join a community server or something. ShadowDeathX I agree with this. I mainly prefer Hybrid Matchmaking for the ease and freedom it offers over traditional matchmaking and server browsers, but for community stuff Server Browsers have agree dating cbe something edge. Dedicated servers on pc tend to have admins as well which kick the kind of idiots you get stuck playing with on console.

Please Log In to post. This topic is locked from further discussion. Bring back the main forum list. Use your keyboard!